Disciplina: Inglês 0 Curtidas

A Dra. Joan Luby afirma que a) há medidas de baixo - UNIFESP 2016

Atualizado em 30/10/2024

Poverty may hinder kids’ brain development, study says

Reduced gray matter, lower test scores reported for poor children

July 20, 2015

UNIFESP 2016

Poverty appears to affect the brain development of children, hampering the growth of gray matter and impairing their academic performance, researchers report. Poor children tend to have as much as 10 percent less gray matter in several areas of the brain associated with academic skills, according to a study published July 20 in JAMA Pediatrics. “We used to think of poverty as a ‘social’ issue, but what we are learning now is that it is a biomedical issue that is affecting brain growth,” said senior study author Seth Pollak, a professor of psychology, pediatrics, anthropology and neuroscience at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
The results could have profound implications for the United States, where low-income students now represent the majority of kids in public schools, the study authors said in background information. Fifty-one percent of public school students came from low-income families in 2013.
Previous studies have shown that children living in poverty tend to perform poorly in school, the authors say. They have markedly lower test scores, and do not go as far in school as their well-off peers.
To see whether this is due to some physical effect that poverty might have on a child’s brain, Pollak and his colleagues analyzed MRI scans of 389 typically developing kids aged 4 to 22, assessing the amount of gray matter in the whole brain as well as the frontal lobe, temporal lobe and hippocampus. “Gray matter contains most of the brain’s neuronal cells,” Pollak said. “In other words, other parts of the brain – like white matter – carry information from one section of the brain to another. But the gray matter is where seeing and hearing, memory, emotions, speech, decision making and self-control occur.”
Children living below 150 percent of the federal poverty level – US$ 36,375 for a family of four – had 3 percent to 4 percent less gray matter in important regions of their brain, compared to the norm, the authors found. Those in families living below the federal poverty level fared even worse, with 8 percent to 10 percent less gray matter in those same brain regions. The federal poverty level in 2015 is US$ 24,250 for a family of four. These same kids scored an average of four to seven points lower on standardized tests, the researchers said.
The team estimated that as much as 20 percent of the gap in test scores could be explained by reduced brain development. A host of poverty-related issues likely contribute to developmental lags in children’s brains, Pollak said. Low-income kids are less likely to get the type of stimulation from their parents and environment that helps the brain grow, he said. For example, they hear fewer new words, and have fewer opportunities to read or play games. Their brain development also can be affected by factors related to impoverishment, such as high stress levels, poor sleep, crowding and poor nutrition, Pollak said.
This study serves as a call to action, given what’s already known about the effects of poverty on child development, said Dr. Joan Luby, a professor of child psychiatry at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. “The thing that’s really important about this study in the context of the broader literature is that there really is enough scientific evidence to take public health action at this point,” said Luby, who wrote an editorial accompanying the study. “Poverty negatively affects brain development, and we also know that early interventions are powerfully effective,” Luby said. “They are more effective than interventions later in life, and they also are cost-effective.”

(www.nlm.nih.gov. Adaptado.)

A Dra. Joan Luby afirma que

  1. há medidas de baixo custo que podem ser tomadas, mesmo na idade adulta, para minimizar o problema.

  2. o estudo deve continuar para aprofundar os dados científicos e sugerir quais ações devem ser imple men - ta das em curto prazo.

  3. escreverá um editorial na próxima edição do periódico JAMA Pediatrics para avaliar o estudo e sua contribuição para a literatura médica.

  4. o tratamento do déficit de massa cinzenta no cérebro da criança deve ser iniciado logo que constatado.

  5. o estudo oferece bases científicas suficientes para que sejam tomadas medidas no âmbito da saúde pública.


Solução

Alternativa Correta: E) o estudo oferece bases científicas suficientes para que sejam tomadas medidas no âmbito da saúde pública.

A resposta E) é correta porque, segundo a Dra. Joan Luby, o estudo fornece evidências científicas robustas que justificam a implementação de ações de saúde pública em resposta aos impactos da pobreza no desenvolvimento cerebral infantil. No texto, Luby afirma claramente que "há evidências científicas suficientes para tomar ações de saúde pública neste momento", o que indica a necessidade urgente de intervenções baseadas em pesquisas para abordar as consequências da pobreza no cérebro das crianças.

Além disso, a Dra. Luby destaca que as intervenções precoces são não apenas eficazes, mas também mais vantajosas em termos de custo do que as que são realizadas em estágios posteriores da vida. Isso reforça a ideia de que medidas de saúde pública devem ser tomadas imediatamente, aproveitando as evidências científicas disponíveis para melhorar as condições de vida e aprendizado das crianças afetadas pela pobreza. Portanto, a ênfase dela na necessidade de ação demonstra a urgência e a importância de tais intervenções.

Em contraste, as outras alternativas não refletem corretamente as afirmações de Luby. Por exemplo, a opção A) sugere que ações de baixo custo podem ser realizadas na idade adulta, enquanto Luby enfatiza a importância de intervenções precoces. As opções B) e C) falham em capturar a urgência da necessidade de ação imediata, e a D) sugere um tratamento específico em vez de uma abordagem de saúde pública mais ampla. Assim, a alternativa E) é a que melhor sintetiza a mensagem do estudo e a perspectiva da Dra. Luby sobre a necessidade de ação com base nas evidências apresentadas.

Institução: UNIFESP

Ano da Prova: 2017

Assuntos: Interpretação Textual em Inglês

Vídeo Sugerido: YouTube

Ainda não há comentários.

Autenticação necessária

É necessário iniciar sessão para comentar

Entrar Registrar

Apoie nosso trabalho!
Assine Agora