Disciplina: Inglês 0 Curtidas

Facebook and Big Tobacco have been put side by side in - UNIFESP 2022

Atualizado em 25/09/2024

Leia o texto para responder a questão.

Facebook officials had internal research in March 2020 showing that Instagram — the social media platform most used by adolescents — is harmful to teen girls’ body image and well-being but swept those findings under the rug to continue conducting business as usual, according to a Sept. 14, 2021, Wall Street Journal report.
Facebook’s policy of pursuing profits regardless of documented harm has sparked comparisons to Big Tobacco, which knew in the 1950s that its products were carcinogenic but publicly denied it into the 21st century. Those of us who study social media use in teens didn’t need a suppressed internal research study to know that Instagram can harm teens.
Understanding the impact of social media on teens is important. A Pew Research Center poll shows that 89% of teens report they are online “almost constantly” or several times a day”. Teens are more likely to log on to Instagram than any other social media site. It is a prevalent part of adolescent life. Yet studies consistently show that the more often teens use Instagram, the worse their overall well-being, self-esteem, life satisfaction, mood and body image.
But Instagram isn’t problematic simply because it is popular. There are two key features that seem to make it particularly risky. First, it allows users to follow both celebrities and peers, both of whom can present a manipulated, filtered picture of an unrealistic body along with a highly curated impression of a perfect life. Meanwhile, Facebook has been relegated to the uncool soccer moms and grandparents. For teens, this integration of celebrities and retouched versions of reallife peers presents a ripe environment for upward social comparison, or comparing yourself to someone who is “better” in some respect.
Instagram is also risky for teens because its emphasis on pictures of the body leads users to focus on how their bodies look to others. Being an object for others to view doesn’t help the “selfie generation” feel empowered and sure of themselves — it can do exactly the opposite. These are not insignificant health concerns, because body dissatisfaction during the teen years is a powerful and consistent predictor of later eating disorder symptoms.
Facebook has acknowledged internally what researchers have been documenting for years: Instagram can be harmful to teens. The big question will be how Facebook handles these damaging results. History and the courts have been less than forgiving of the head-inthe-sand approach of Big Tobacco.

(Christia Spears Brown
www.theconversation.com, 16.09.2021. Adaptado.)

Facebook and Big Tobacco have been put side by side in the first two paragraphs for the reason that

  1. neither of the two have publicly acknowledged proven health damage precipitated by their products.

  2. their products, though at different time periods, have been top brands in the world market.

  3. both companies have admitted their eagerness for increasing gains and achieving success.

  4. they have both been subject of articles by The Wall Street Journal, an important mainstream media institution.

  5. both companies have been the subject of research papers on carcinogenic illnesses.


Solução

Alternativa Correta: A) neither of the two have publicly acknowledged proven health damage precipitated by their products.

A resposta correta é a alternativa A, pois o texto compara Facebook e Big Tobacco em relação ao acobertamento de informações sobre os danos que suas respectivas plataformas e produtos causam à saúde. O autor menciona que, assim como a indústria do tabaco ignorou os riscos carcinogênicos associados aos seus produtos, o Facebook também ocultou pesquisas que demonstravam que o Instagram é prejudicial à saúde e ao bem-estar de adolescentes, especialmente meninas.

Essa comparação é fundamental para destacar a irresponsabilidade corporativa em ambas as situações. O texto sugere que, apesar das evidências, ambas as empresas priorizam o lucro em detrimento da transparência e da responsabilidade social. Essa analogia entre as duas indústrias serve para enfatizar a gravidade das ações do Facebook, que continua a operar sem considerar os impactos negativos que suas plataformas têm sobre os jovens.

Além disso, a comparação não se limita a um aspecto econômico, mas abrange a ética das empresas em relação à saúde pública. A ausência de reconhecimento sobre os danos provocados por seus produtos é uma questão central que liga Facebook e Big Tobacco, reforçando a crítica ao comportamento negligente e à falta de responsabilidade social que ambas as empresas demonstram. Portanto, a alternativa A é a mais adequada, pois captura a essência da crítica apresentada no texto.

Institução: UNIFESP

Ano da Prova: 2022

Assuntos: Interpretação Textual em Inglês

Vídeo Sugerido: YouTube

Ainda não há comentários.

Autenticação necessária

É necessário iniciar sessão para comentar

Entrar Registrar

Apoie nosso trabalho!
Assine Agora